Password Recovery
Kit v7.3
Reviewed
by: Howard
Carson, February 2007
Published
by: Passware
Requires: Windows
95 through Vista, 16MB RAM, Pentium II or faster
MSRP: $395.00
Lost
passwords probably account for tens of millons of dollars
worth of lost data, time and energy every year. While accurate
statistics don't really exist, it's safe to say that almost
every home and business computer owner has been frustrated
at one time or another by inaccessible locked documents,
spreadsheets and other files. If you don't have the password,
you can't get at the data in the file. With passwords and
other data security requirements being imposed more often
and more widely at the vast majority of businesses around
the world, it's probably smart to have a handy password
recovery utility at hand.
Since
1998, Passware has been supplying Help Desk personnel,
IT professionals, and business users with security tools
designed to recover lost passwords. The main product,
Password Recovery Kit, works with all versions of Microsoft
Office, including the latest Office 2007 releases of
Access, Excel, Word, Outlook, Visio and VBA. The software
also recovers passwords from Quicken, QuickBooks, WordPerfect,
WinZip, Windows 2000/XP/NT, 1-2-3, ACT!, Paradox, Organizer,
Adobe Acrobat, WinZip and many other popular business
software programs (the current total is 26). The SureZip
recovery module decrypts most WinZip archives. The Windows
module lets a user reset Windows security if the Administrator
password, secure boot password, or key disk have been
lost. The program can also be used to create Windows
NT Key boot disks which can be used to unlock a system.
Installing
Password Recovery Kit is extremely simple and takes less
than a minute. The program entry on the Windows Start>Programs
menu opens up into a very long list of key utilities
(Word key, Lotus key, Excel key, etc.). The software
uses a combination of security, decompression and decryption
algorithms and dictionary look-ups to do its work. Using
Password Recovery Kit (PRK) is even simpler than installing
it. Simply run the program and choose the unlock key
from among the file types that the program processes.
Each unlock key corresponds to a specific file format,
i.e.: the Word key is used on Microsoft Word documents,
the Excel key is used on Microsoft Excel documents, and
so on. Launch the Word key, set the password recovery
options (or use the defaults), load a Word doc. That's
it. Password Recovery Kit starts working automatically.
The
software finds a password by literally trying millions
of passwords per minute. The Brute-force attack method
is the slowest approach and can try all passwords up
to 7 characters in length. The Xieve attack method is
faster and capable of recovering passwords of up to 9
characters. The Dictionary attack method (which uses
only letter combinations) is fastest and there's no limitation
on password length. In my tests I found that the fastest
results using any of the methods came from having at
least a vague idea of what the lost password might have
been. There's no sane reason to attempt a recovery using
letters only if the file owner insists that the password
was all numbers. Save yourself some time and define the
recovery parameters as narrowly as possible. The password "helena" (on
a Word 2000 doc) required exactly one-tenth of a second
to recover - amazingly fast. However, the password "helena1" required
a full hour to recover. Ditto for "1543267" versus "154a267".
But if the document is important and contains information
which is not available anywhere else, it's worth the
wait.
We found
huge differences between various CPUs. The latest dual
core processors from Intel work wonderfully well. The comparison
between a fast dual core CPU in a brand new Dell Dimension
desktop PC running Windows XP Professional and a three
year old Pentium 4 2.8GHz Windows XP machine was striking,
allowing the Password Recovery Kit to do its work between
35% and 65% faster, depending on the file format.
If you
allow staff to place password protection on documents created
for internal use, create and insist on a policy of either
plain language passwords or numeric passwords. Allowing
staff to create any old random, overly complex or overlong
password may result in a situation which stymies even Password
Recovery Kit. Keep it simple. Documents for use outside
the company need more powerful schemes, including digital
signatures combined with password locks and encryption.
Creating a password suitable for military intelligence
use is fine in a Department of Defense environment, but
inappropriate for your typical business office which stores
a comparative handful of confidential documents (none of
which have anything to do with national security).
Cons: This
isn't really a Con but you need to know that complex or
overlong passwords may require a day or more for Password
Recovery Kit to discover. That's just the nature of brute-force
recoveries. Note that Word 2003, 2002/2000 & 97 and
Excel 2003, 2002/2000 & 97 use an industrial strength
RC4 encryption algorithm that makes instant password calculation
impossible. The MS Office key (Word, Access, Excel, etc.)
cannot always recover passwords for office docs which have
been encrypted by 3rd-party software.
Pros: Works
with Microsoft Office 2007 documents. Password Recovery
Kit speed is limited only by the speed of your CPU. If
you are in an environment which generates confidential
information (spec sheets, research, analysis, private reports,
designs, reviews, etc.) you will eventually need to lock
and protect documents. That activity unfortunately goes
hand-in-hand with lost passwords. Password Recovery Kit
will eliminate many headaches for IS/IT managers. Managers
of small offices will also benefit, especially in areas
with high turnover or staff churn. As well, for anyone
involved in general research, there are some weeks when
locked documents with missing passwords seem to be a way
of life. Passware's product works well and it will pay
for itself the very first time a password is recovered
for some crucial document, spec or design. Highly recommended.
|
|